Digital Parenting Mediation for Children with Mild Intellectual Disability: Predictors of Restrictive and Active Strategies

  • Annisa May Syarah Nasution 
    Universitas Negeri Medan
    Indonesia
  • Yeni Irma Normawati
    Universitas Negeri Medan
    Indonesia
  • Rezi Akbar Zarnazi
    Universitas Negeri Medan
    Indonesia

Abstract

Children with mild intellectual disability are particularly vulnerable to online exploitation, cyberbullying, and excessive screen exposure due to limitations in critical reasoning and social comprehension. This descriptive correlational study explored parental mediation patterns among families whose children regularly use digital devices. A culturally adapted 25 item questionnaire (20 mediation items + 4 parental self efficacy items) was used. This research was analyzed using ANOVA. The findings indicate significant differences in parental mediation, with restrictive strategies more pronounced among families with longer gadget use and active mediation more prevalent among parents with higher education and greater self-efficacy. Overall, parental belief in their ability to manage technology, combined with educational factors and children's device-use habits, shaped the form and intensity of mediation. The findings underscore the need for digital parenting interventions that reinforce parental confidence and encourage a more balanced shift from restrictive control toward supportive, communicative, and proactive mediation strategies.

Keywords
  • Parenting Mediation
  • Mild Intellectual Disabilities
  • Digital Risks
  • Restrictive Mediation
  • Active Mediation
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nasution, A. M. S., Normawati, Y. I., & Zarnazi, R. A. (2025). Digital Parenting Mediation for Children with Mild Intellectual Disability: Predictors of Restrictive and Active Strategies. Journal of Counseling and Educational Research, 2(2), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.63203/jcerch.v2i2.404
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Abdelwahab, M. M., Al-Karawi, K. A., & Semary, H. E. (2025). A Systematic Review of Assistive Technology for Enhancing the Students with Disabilities. Journal of Disability Research, 4(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.57197/JDR-2024-0117
  2. Adorjan, M., Ricciardelli, R., & Saleh, T. (2022). Parental Technology Governance: Teenagers’ Understandings and Responses to Parental Digital Mediation. Qualitative Sociology Review, 18(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.18.2.06
  3. Brito, R., Francisco, R., Dias, P., & Chaudron, S. (2017). Family dynamics in digital homes: The role played by parental mediation in young children’s digital practices around 14 European countries. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(4), 271–280.
  4. Caton, S., & Chapman, M. (2017). The Use of Social Media and People with Intellectual Disability. 107–126.
  5. Cibrian, F. L., Monteiro, E., Ankrah, E., Beltran, J. A., Tavakoulnia, A., Schuck, S. E. B., Hayes, G. R., & Lakes, K. D. (2021). Parents’ perspectives on a smartwatch intervention for children with ADHD: Rapid deployment and feasibility evaluation of a pilot intervention to support distance learning during COVID-19. PLoS ONE, 16(10 October), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258959
  6. Creswell, J. (2018). Research Design. In Acht grafvondsten van de Veluwse klokbekergroep als uitgangspunt voor chronologische beschouwingen over de relaties saalisch-böhmische Schnurkeramik, Enkelgrafcultuur, Klokbeker-Oostgroep en Nederlands-Westduitse klokbekergroepen. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2204s7w.11
  7. Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  8. Griffiths, M. D., Benrazavi, R., & Teimouri, M. (2016). Parental mediation and adolescent screen time: A brief overview. Education and Health, 34(3), 70–73.
  9. Jenaro, C., Flores, N., Vega, V., Cruz, M., Pérez, M. C., & Torres, V. A. (2018). Cyberbullying among adults with intellectual disabilities: Some preliminary data. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 72(April 2017), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.12.006
  10. Kalmus, V., & Roosalu, T. (2011). Parental mediation of EU kids’ Internet use revisited: Looking for a complex model of cross-national differences. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 7(1), 55–66.
  11. Kanashov, A. E., & Trusova, A. V. (2021). Rol’faktorov semeynogo vospitaniya v formirovanii internet-zavisimogo povedeniya u podrostkov [The role of family relationships in Internet addiction in adolescents]. Natsional’nyy Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2, 76–87.
  12. Kirwil, L., Garmendia, M., Garitaonandia, C., & Fernandez, G. M. (2009). Parental mediation. In Kids online (pp. 199–216). Policy Press.
  13. Lafton, T., Wilhelmsen, J. E. B., & Holmarsdottir, H. B. (2024). Parental mediation and children’s digital well-being in family life in Norway. Journal of Children and Media, 18(2), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2023.2299956
  14. Livingstone, S., & Byrne, J. (2018). Parenting in the digital age: The challenges of parental responsibility in comparative perspective. Digital Parenting: The Challenges for Families in the Digital Age, Yearbook 2018, 2018, 19–30.
  15. Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Dreier, M., Chaudron, S., & Lagae, K. (2015). How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style.
  16. Lundmark, M. (2025). The Use of Assistive Technology on the Social Inclusion and Physical Engagement of Students with Disabilities in Physical Education A. 1–42.
  17. Mahmud, H. (2016). Skala Pengukuran.
  18. Martínez-Arnau, F. M., Núñez-Cortés, R., Valderrama-Mejía, J. M., Cruz-Montecinos, C., Carrasco, J. J., & Cortés-Amador, S. (2023). Reduced lip seal strength and missing teeth are associated with poorer masticatory performance in young adults with intellectual disabilities: a cross-sectional analytical study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 67(7), 630–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13032
  19. Nagy, B., Kutrovátz, K., Király, G., & Rakovics, M. (2023). Parental mediation in the age of mobile technology. Children & Society, 37(2), 424–451.
  20. Nichols, S., & Selim, N. (2022). Digitally Mediated Parenting: A Review of the Literature. Societies, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020060
  21. Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015). How and Why Parents Guide the Media Use of Young Children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(11), 3423–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4
  22. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2011). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. ReadHowYouWant. com.
  23. Poerwanti, S. D., Makmun, S., & Dewantara, A. D. (2024). Jalan Panjang Menuju Inklusi Digital bagi Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia. Journal of Urban Sociology, 1(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.30742/jus.v1i1.3536
  24. Sari, W., Machmud, H., & Anhusadar, L. (2024). Pengawasan Orang Tua terhadap Penggunaan Gadget pada Anak Usia Dini. BOCAH: Borneo Early Childhood Education and Humanity Journal, 3(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.21093/bocah.v3i2.8251
  25. Sciacca, B., Laffan, D. A., Norman, J. O., & Milosevic, T. (2022). Parental mediation in pandemic: Predictors and relationship with children’s digital skills and time spent online in Ireland. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107081.
  26. Sobkin, V. S., & Fedotova, A. V. (2021). Adolescents on social media: Aggression and cyberbullying. Psychology in Russia, 14(4), 186.
  27. Suwahyo, B. W., Setyosari, P., & Praherdhiono, H. (2022). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Asistif Dalam Pendidikan Inklusif. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v7i12022p055
  28. Syahputra, Y., Rahmat, C. P., & Erwinda, L. (2025). Instrumentasi Tes dalam Bimbingan dan Konseling. CV Eureka Media Aksara.
  29. Talves, K., & Kalmus, V. (2015). Gendered mediation of children’s internet use: A keyhole for looking into changing socialization practices. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(1).

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Issue

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 34 times
PDF
: 23 times

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.