Social Interaction of Adolescents: An Impact Analysis of Phubbing Behavior

  • Lailatul Magfiroh 
    Family Welfare Education Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
    Indonesia
  • Maya Oktaviani
    Family Welfare Education Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
    Indonesia
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5295-715X
  • Hurriyyatun Kabbaro
    Family Welfare Education Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
    Indonesia

Abstract

For adolescents, the need to interact is very important amidst the development of smartphone use for social, emotional, and psychological development has an influence on prioritizing and valuing direct social interaction. This study aims to determine the effect of phubbing behavior on social interaction in adolescents at SMP Negeri 74 Jakarta. The study was conducted using an associative quantitative research method with a data collection method using a questionnaire. The location of the study was at SMP Negeri 74 Jakarta and took place from May 2024 - June 2024. The respondents in this study were 150 adolescents who met the specified criteria. The data collection technique in this study used a nonprobability sampling technique with a purposive sampling approach, where the sample was used if it met the following criteria: adolescents aged 12-16 years calculated from the age of the study period before May 2024 and Have a smartphone and actively use a smartphone. This study used the Social Interaction Skills (SIS) instrument by Lamash et al., (2023) and had a reliability coefficient of 0.890 for social interaction and the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) Chotpitayasunondh & Douglas, (2018) reliability coefficient of 0.769 for phubbing behavior. The data analysis technique used was a significant regression test, which produced a Fhit value (b / a) = 16.782 and a Sig. value of 0.000 <0.05. The results showed that phubbing behavior had an effect on social interaction in adolescents at SMP Negeri 74 Jakarta. Furthermore, the results of the determination coefficient were 0.102, so that the contribution of phubbing behavior to social interaction was 10.2%. Adolescents who have high phubbing behavior will have low social interaction. The results of this study are to raise awareness of the negative impacts of phubbing on social interactions, especially schools, providing counseling services to students who are identified as being dependent on digital devices or who show signs of difficulty in social interactions. Counselors can help students develop social skills.

Keywords
  • Social Interaction
  • Phubbing Behavior
  • Adolescent Behavior
How to Cite
Magfiroh, L., Oktaviani, M., & Kabbaro, H. (2024). Social Interaction of Adolescents: An Impact Analysis of Phubbing Behavior. Journal of Counseling and Educational Research, 1(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.63203/jcerch.v1i2.109
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Adams, S. K., & Kisler, T. S. (2013). Sleep quality as a mediator between technology-related sleep quality, depression, and anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(1), 25–30.
  2. Afdal, A., Alizamar, A., Ifdil, I., Zadrian, A., Sukmawati, I., Zikra, Z., ... & Syahputra, Y. (2018). An Analysis of Phubbing Behaviour: Preliminary research from counseling perspective.
  3. Alizamar, A., Fikri, M., Afdal, A., Syahputra, Y., Sukmawati, I., & Ilyas, A. (2019). Phubbing Behavior: How it’s Related to Happiness. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(6), 348-358.
  4. Andina, Y. T., & Barida, M. (2021). Mengenal Fenomenal Perilaku Phubbing Dikalangan Remaja. In Kamis.
  5. Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12506
  6. González-Rivera, J. A., Segura Abreu, L., & Urbistondo-Rodríguez, V. (2018). Phubbing en las Relaciones Románticas: Uso del Celular, Satisfacción en la Pareja, Bienestar Psicológico y Salud Mental. Interacciones. Revista de Avances En Psicología, 4(2), 81– 91. https://doi.org/10.24016/2018.v4n2.117
  7. Hafizah, N., Adriansyah, M. A., & Permatasari, R. F. (2021). Kontrol Diri dan Komunikasi Interpersonal Terhadap Perilaku Phubbing Article Info ABSTRACT. Psikoborneo Jurnal Imiah Psikologi, 9, 630–645. https://doi.org/10.30872/psikoborneo
  8. Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Mızrak Şahin, B., … Babadağ, B. (2016). The Virtual World’s Current Addiction: Phubbing. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0013
  9. Karadag, E., Tosuntas, S. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Sahin, B. M., & Babadag, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 60–74.
  10. Kelly, L., Miller-Ott, A. E., & Duran, R. L. (2019). Phubbing friends: Understanding face threats from, and responses to, friends’ cell phone usage through the lens of politeness theory. Communication Quarterly, 1–20.
  11. Lamash, L., Fogel, Y., & Hen-Herbst, L. (2023). Adolescents’ Social Interaction Skills on Social Media Versus in Person and The Correlations to Well-being. Journal of Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12244
  12. Meinanto, D., Putrawan, B. K., & Simangunsong, A. (2022). Degradasi Moral Generasi Z: Suatu Tinjauan Etis Teologis terhadap Penggunaan Internet. IMMANUEL: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen, 3(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.46305/im.v3i1.86
  13. Nurdiani, N. (2014). Teknik Sampling Snowball Dalam Penelitian Lapangan (Vol. 5, Issue 2).
  14. Puteri, M., & Wangid, M. N. (2018). Hubungan antara Kelekatan dengan Interaksi Sosial pada Siswa. PSIKOPEDAGOGIA Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 6(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.12928/psikopedagogia.v6i2.9439
  15. Sandjajaa, S. S., & Syahputra, Y. (2019). Has a fear of missing out contributed to phubbing among students. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(6), 219-230.
  16. Sagita, D. D., Erwinda, L., & Syahputra, Y. (2020, March). Contribution of the Internet Uses to Student Morale: Study in High School. In International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019) (pp. 330-332). Atlantis Press.
  17. Syahrah, I. S., Mustadjar, M., & Agustang, A. (2020). Pergeseran Pola Interaksi Sosial ( Studi Pada Masyarakat Banggae Kabupaten Majene ). Phinisi Integration Review, 3(2), 138. https://doi.org/10.26858/pir.v3i2.14393
  18. Syahputra, Y., & Erwinda, L. (2020). Perbedaan Nomophobia mahasiswa; analisis Rasch. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 6(2), 69-76.
  19. Syahputra, Y., Prayitno, P., Syahniar, S., & Hariyani, H. (2019). Rasch stacking analysis of student internet addiction based on gender. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 7(1), 35-41.
  20. Syahputra, Y., Rangka, I. B., Solihatun, S., Folastri, S., & Oktasari, M. (2020, December). Mengukur Sifat Psikometri Phubbing Scale (PS): Rasch Measurement Tool (RMS). In Seminar Nasional Daring IIBKIN 2020 (pp. 120-128).
  21. Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.014
  22. Widiyanti, S. D., & Asri, D. N. (2023). Analisis Interaksi Sosial Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Ponorogo. 2(2), 810–816. http://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/SENASSDRA
  23. Widodo, A. S., & Pratitis, N. T. (2013). Harga Diri dan Interaksi Sosial Ditinjau dari Status Sosial Ekonomi Orang Tua (Vol. 2, Issue 2).

Issue

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 205 times
PDF
: 82 times

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.