The Relationship of Self Confidence and Glossophobia in Students

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the description of self-confidence in class VIII students at SMPN 59 Bekasi, to determine the description of glossophobia in class VIII students at SMPN 59 Bekasi, and to determine whether or not there is a relationship between self-confidence and glossophobia in class VIII students at SMPN 59 Bekasi. The method used in this research is a quantitative method, namely descriptive statistics with the type of data obtained based on a survey using a self-confidence and glossophobia level questionnaire. The population is class VIII students with a total of 270 students. And the total sample is 161 students. Data analysis using SPSS. The results of the analysis of the data that has been collected and studied based on the data that has been obtained, show that Self-Confidence has a significant relationship with glossophobia at SMPN 59 Bekasi as shown by the results of processing the analysis of the simple linear regression equation obtained, namely Y = 110.337 - 0.848 X1 with a value significance is 0.000 < 0.05, then this value states that there is a negative influence (in the opposite direction) between the Self-Confidence variable and the glossophobic behavior variable. This means that if Self-Confidence increases by one unit, then on the other hand, glossophobic behavior will decrease by 0.848.

Keywords
  • Self-Confidence
  • Glossophobia
  • Students
How to Cite
Ningrum, Y. W., & Lestari, M. (2024). The Relationship of Self Confidence and Glossophobia in Students . JITSS (Journal of Innovation and Trend in Social Sciences), 1(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.63203/jitss.v1i1.24
References
  1. Adnyana, I. M. D. M. (2021). Populasi dan Sampel. Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif, 14(1), 103–116.
  2. Amalia, C. (2018). Upaya Guru Bimbingan Konseling Dalam Mengatasi Kecemasan Belajar Siswa Di Kelas XI MIA 4 MAN 2 Deli Serdang Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan.
  3. Arifin, N. (2022). Pengaruh daya juang dan kemandirian belajar secara online terhadap tanggung jawab belajar mahasiswa PGSD. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 3268–3278.
  4. Armadani, J. P., & Laksmiwati, H. (2022). Hubungan Antara Motivasi Berprestasi Dengan Kecerdasan Adversitas Pada Mahasiswa Yang Bekerja. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 9(7).
  5. Baird, S. L. (2016). Conceptualizing anxiety among social work students: Implications for social work education. Social Work Education, 35.
  6. De Villiers, R. (2010). The incorporation of soft skills into accounting curricula: preparing accounting graduates for their unpredictable futures. Meditari Accountancy Research, 18(2), 1–22.
  7. Fatoni, A., Dewi, P., & Triana, N. (2022). Gambaran Tingkat Kecemasan Orang Tua Siswa Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka (PTM) Pada Era Pandemi Covid-19 Di Sd Negeri 1 Panambangan. Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, 2(1), 157–165.
  8. Hambali, I., Wahyuni, F. (2022). Tingkat Ansietas Mahasiswa Indonesia Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmu Keperawatan Jiwa, 5(1). https://journal.ppnijateng.org/index.php/jikj
  9. Harahap, I. D., & Pranungsari, D. (2020). Hubungan antara konsep diri dan adversity quotient dengan kecemasan menghadapi masa depan remaja jalanan. Universitas Ahmad Dahlan.
  10. Huda, T. N., & Mulyana, A. (2017). Pengaruh adversity quotient terhadap prestasi akademik mahasiswa angkatan 2013 fakultas psikologi UIN SGD Bandung. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 4(1), 115–132.
  11. Humami, F., Mukhadis, A., & Sumarli, S. (2014). the effect of numbered heads together (NHT) teaching model and adversity quotient on learning achievement subjects of energy conversion machines. Vocational Technology, 37(2), 119–128.
  12. Leny Ali, Nur Uyuun I. Biahimo, Rahmawati Ibrahim, & Nazli Alamri. (2021). Adaptasi Pembelajaran Online Dengan Tingkat Kecemasan Pada Anak Usia Sekolah Selama Masa Pandemi Di Sdn 2 Kota Barat. Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Kesehatan, 1(2), 31–42.
  13. Mahardika, H. G., Matulessy, A., & Rini, A. P. (2022). Resiliensi Dan Kebersyukuran Terhadap Kecemasan Saat Pembelajaran Tatap Muka(PTM) Pada Siswa. Repository Fakultas Psikologi Untag Surabaya.
  14. Martin, A. D. (2009). Emotional Quality Management : Refleksi, Revisi, dan Revitalisasi Hidup Melalui Kekuatan Emosi(2nd ed.). Arga Excellency.
  15. Mayasari, H., Astuti, I., & Wicaksono, L. (2021). Analisis Kecemasan Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Daring Pada Kelas Xi Ma Islamiyah Pontianak Tahun2021. Program Studi Bimbingan Dan Konseling FKIP Untan Pontianak.
  16. Mukholil. (2018). Kecemasan dalam Proses Belajar. Jurnal Eksponen, 8(1).
  17. Mulyani, E., Wahyuningsih, S., & Natalliasari, I. (2019). Adversity Quotient Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika dan Keterkaitannya dengan Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 119–130.
  18. Nazir, M., & Sikumbang, R. (2013). Metode Penelitian(R. Sikumbang (ed.); 8th ed.). Ghalia Indonesia.
  19. Nurfitri, E. A., & Nastiti, D. (2021). Relationship Between Adversity Quotient And Answering Between The Tahfidz Exam At The Santri Pondok Pesantren. Academia Open, 6. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.6.2022.1638
  20. Rachmady, T. M. N., & Aprilia, E. D. (2018). Hubungan adversity quotient dengan kecemasan menghadapi dunia kerja pada freshgraduate Universitas Syiah Kuala. Journal Psikogenesis, 6(1), 54–60.
  21. Rinawati, S., & Hartono, H. (2019). The Analysis of Studentâ€TMs Problem Solving Difficulty Viewed From Adversity Quotient on Means-Ends Analysis Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(2), 165–172.
  22. Safitri, A. N., & Juniati, D. (2018). Students’ Relational Understanding in Quadrilateral Problem Solving Based on Adversity Quotient. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1), 12039.
  23. Setyawati, M. (2017). Daya juang menghadapi diskriminasi kerja pada penyandang tunadaksa. Psikoborneo, 5(1), 56–67.
  24. Shemaili, N. B. (2013). Correlation between Experiential learning and Optimism among College students. The British University in Dubai.
  25. Stoltz, P. G. (2005). Adversity Quotient Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang(Y. Hardiwati (ed.); 6th ed.). PT. Grasindo -Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
  26. Surya, M. A. (2021). Kontribusi Adversity Quotient Dengan Kecemasan Menghadapi Dunia Kerja Pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Bimbingan Penyuluhan Islam Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi UIN Sumatera Utara.
  27. Susanti, R. (2019). Sampling dalam Penelitian Pendidikan. Jurnal Teknodik, 0(0 SE-Articles), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v0i0.543
  28. Toribio-Ferrer, C., & Franco-Bárcenas, S. (2016). Estrés académico: el enemigo silencioso del estudiante. Revista Salud y Administración, 3(7), 11–18.
  29. Vinas, D. K. D., & Malabanan, M. G. A. (2015). Adversity quotient and coping strategies of college students in Lyceum of the Philippines University. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 2(3), 68–72.
  30. Wang, R., Chen, F., Chen, Z., Li, T., Harari, G., Tignor, S., Zhou, X., Ben-Zeev, D., & Campbell, A. T. (2014). Student Life: assessing mental health, academic performance and behavioral trends of college students using smartphones. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 3–14.
  31. Yurtseven, N., & Akpur, U. (2018). Perfectionism, Anxiety and Procrastination as Predictors of EFL Academic Achievement: A Mixed Methods Study. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 12(2), 96–115.
  32. Zulkifli. (2022). Imbas Regulasi Dan Perubahan Kultur Pendidikan di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Kabupaten Sidenreng Rappang. MASOKAN: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 2(1).
  33. Zuraida. (2018). Hubungan Adversity Quotient Dengan ProkrastinasiAkademik Dalam Penyelesaian Skripsi Pada MahasiswaYang Bekerja Di PTS. Universitas Potensi Utama. Kognisi Jurnal, 2(2), 136–147.